Federal Law Preempts One State's Rest and Meal Break Laws
Recently, a federal district court in California determined that motor carriers that transport property are not subject to California's meal and rest break laws, reasoning such laws are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act ("FAAAA"). For those interested, the case is Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122421 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011). The case is particularly interesting because it illustrates the supremacy of federal law where Congress has expressed its desire to legislate in a particular substantive area—here, the body of law governing motor carriers' routes, prices and services with respect to the transportation of property.
Through the FAAAA, Congress sought to preempt (effectively nullify) certain state-level trucking regulations, consistent with its deregulation of the trucking industry in 1980, through the enactment of the Motor Carrier Act. To that end, the FAAAA preempts state laws and regulations that have a direct or indirect connection with, or reference to, motor carriers' prices, routes or services with respect to the transportation of property. Motor carriers have successfully invoked the FAAAA to avoid the application of various state laws that create an unlevel playing field for motor carriers—e.g., state tobacco laws. The FAAAA may also preempt the application of certain state unemployment compensation statutes where such laws presumptively treat independent-contractor drivers as employees for purposes of eligibility for state unemployment compensation benefits.
In Penske Logistics, 349 hourly appliance delivery drivers and installers filed a class action against Penske, claiming, among other things, that Penske failed to provide required meal and rest breaks. Significantly, the Court held that the FAAAA preempted the application of California's meal and rest break laws, after it evaluated "whether the [meal and rest break law], directly or indirectly, binds the…carrier to a particular price, route or service and thereby interferes with competitive market forces within the…industry." According to the Court, the meal and rest break law did interfere with competitive market forces. Specifically, the laws related to "routes" because they deprive delivery drivers of the "ability to take any route that does not offer adequate locations for stopping, or by forcing them to take shorter or fewer routes." The laws also related to motor carrier "services" because they imposed conditions that affected the "frequency and scheduling of transportation." Finally, the laws impacted Penske's "prices" because of the increased cost of additional drivers, helpers, tractors, and trailers necessary to ensure off-duty breaks under California law.
The plaintiffs in Penske Logistics may elect to appeal the decision to a higher federal court—it's worth monitoring!
Legal Disclaimer
The Employment and Labor Law Dispatcher Blog is made available by Ruder Ware to provide a general understanding of some of the legal issues relating to the transportation industry. This site does not provide specific legal advice and you should not use the information contained on this site to address your specific situation without consulting with legal counsel that is well versed in employment and labor laws and regulations. By using the Employment and Labor Law Dispatcher Blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and Ruder Ware or any individual attorney. Postings on this site do not represent the views of our clients. This site may link to other information resources on the Internet. These sites are not endorsed or supported by Ruder Ware, and Ruder Ware does not vouch for the accuracy or reliability of any information provided therein.
Please do not send any confidential information to anyone at the firm before an attorney-client relationship is formally established. Any email communication submitted in response to this blog will not be considered confidential and will not be protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege.
For further information regarding the articles on this blog, contact Ruder Ware through our primary website, www.ruderware.com
Member Log In
Blogger List
- Andy Shefsky
- Angie Bruskotter
- Bill Kistner
- Bob Rutherford
- Bryan T. Symes
- Clayton Boyce
- Dale Reagan
- Dan Baker
- Dave Coker
- David Hershey
- Del Lisk
- Duff Swain
- Eddie Roman
- Editor's Choice
- Ellen Voie
- Glen Sokolis
- Greg Roche
- Jack Jackson
- Jack Jones
- Jack Lee
- Jim Angel
- Jim Buchanan
- Joe Morrison
- Joe White
- John Firmino
- Johnny Schrunk
- Mike Buck
- Oren Summer
- Pam Whitfield
- Pierro Hirsch
- Randy Seals
- Ray Gompf
- Rickey Gooch
- Robert Franklin
- Rob Friday
- Rob Moseley
- Rob Pallante
- Salena Lettera
- Sharon Bell
- Shawn M. Sullivan
- Thom Williams
- Tom Kretsinger, Jr.
- Trent Tillman
- Tripper Allen
- Wayne Schooling C.P.S.A.





















Post new comment